BINT vs. BDBT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, BINT returned 29.01% vs 3.98% for BDBT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.

Performance

BINT vs. BDBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than BDBT's 0.29% return.

BINT

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDBT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 3.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. BDBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	13.31%	14.43%
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	0.29%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and BDBT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

BINT vs. BDBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 62
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 30
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. BDBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	BDBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.03	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	1.54	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.18	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.39	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	3.94	+6.95

BINT vs. BDBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the BDBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and BDBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. BDBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BDBT's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BDBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	BDBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-2.88%	-8.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-2.88%	-8.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-1.51%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-0.75%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	1.01%	+1.66%

Volatility

BINT vs. BDBT - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) at 1.13%. This indicates that BINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	BDBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	1.13%	+6.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	2.89%	+10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	3.86%	+11.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	3.86%	+11.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	3.86%	+11.90%

BINT vs. BDBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BINT and BDBT have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BINT vs. BDBT - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BDBT's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.52%	2.21%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.01%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and BDBT in my portfolio?

BINT and BDBT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINT or BDBT?

BINT has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to BDBT (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs BDBT's -2.88%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or BDBT?

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 29.01% vs 3.98% for BDBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. On volatility, BDBT has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or BDBT?

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 29.01% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or BDBT?

BINT and BDBT have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or BDBT?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.01% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BINT and BDBT?

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while BDBT is Intermediate Core Bond.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.