BINT vs. BLST
BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.23% expense ratio.
Performance
BINT vs. BLST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.25% return.
BINT
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 6M
- 17.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINT vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 15.74% | 13.85% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.25% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINT and BLST is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.38 |
BINT vs. BLST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BINT
BLST
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
BINT
BLST
-
Financial Services
BINT
BLST
Industrials
BINT
BLST
-
Consumer Cyclical
BINT
BLST
-
Healthcare
BINT
BLST
-
Communication Services
BINT
BLST
-
Basic Materials
BINT
BLST
-
Consumer Defensive
BINT
BLST
-
Energy
BINT
BLST
-
Utilities
BINT
BLST
-
Real Estate
BINT
BLST
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINT vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINT | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.31 | 1.51 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
BINT vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BLST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINT | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -1.69% | -9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.92% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -0.35% | -1.12% |
Volatility
BINT vs. BLST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINT | BLST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 2.21% | +12.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 2.21% | +12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 2.21% | +12.49% |
BINT vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BINT and BLST have an expense ratio of 0.23%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BINT vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison
BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BLST's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.08% |
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.38% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINT and BLST have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.23% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINT and BLST have the same expense ratio: 0.23% per year.
BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.99% for BINT.
BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while BLST is Short-Term Bond.
Find the right allocation for BINT and BLST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer