BINT vs. BLUI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while BLUI is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, BINT returned 29.01% vs 7.60% for BLUI. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLUI.

Performance

BINT vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than BLUI's 3.65% return.

BINT

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLUI

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 3.78%
• 1Y: 7.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	13.31%	14.43%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	3.65%	3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and BLUI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.53

The correlation between BINT and BLUI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BINT vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 62
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BLUI

BLUI Risk / Return Rank: 71
BLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	BLUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.96	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.88	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.38	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.14	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	13.68	-2.80

BINT vs. BLUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the BLUI Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and BLUI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BLUI's maximum drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BLUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	BLUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-2.43%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-2.43%	-8.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-0.13%	-2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-0.36%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	0.56%	+2.11%

Volatility

BINT vs. BLUI - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI) at 1.07%. This indicates that BINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	BLUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	1.07%	+6.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	3.08%	+10.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	3.91%	+11.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.76%	3.91%	+11.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	3.91%	+11.85%

BINT vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BLUI's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.01%	1.08%
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF	4.70%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and BLUI in my portfolio?

BINT and BLUI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINT or BLUI?

BINT has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to BLUI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs BLUI's -2.43%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or BLUI?

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 29.01% vs 7.60% for BLUI. On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BLUI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or BLUI?

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 29.01% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or BLUI?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or BLUI?

BLUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 1.01% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BINT and BLUI?

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while BLUI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.75% for BLUI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.