TILL vs. SDCI
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) are both Commodities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.74%/yr vs 22.95%/yr for SDCI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SDCI.
Performance
TILL vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 26.96% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 26.96%
- 6M
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 38.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.10% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 26.96% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and SDCI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
SDCI
TILL vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.38 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 4.29 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 15.33 | -15.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 2.30 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | 0.67 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, smaller than the maximum SDCI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and SDCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -45.79% | +12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -9.04% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.40% | -11.96% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.47% | -4.51% | -24.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -11.58% | -9.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 2.52% | +2.89% |
Volatility
TILL vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 4.82%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | SDCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.82% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 14.25% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 16.89% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 18.46% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.08% | -2.34% |
TILL vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SDCI's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than SDCI's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.90% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and SDCI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TILL has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SDCI (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs SDCI's -45.79%.
On 3-year performance, SDCI leads with 22.95% vs -5.74% for TILL. On fees, SDCI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, SDCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 22.95% return vs -5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDCI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 2.90% for SDCI.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.70% for SDCI.
SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and SDCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer