PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. CCRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDCI vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SDCI

1D
0.63%
1M
10.03%
6M
20.73%
YTD
31.41%
1Y
39.13%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.58%

CCRV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.69M$7.12M$7.50M

SDCI vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
31.41%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%7.08%
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%5.47%19.91%33.78%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and CCRV is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SDCI and CCRV has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDCI vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDCICCRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

SDCI vs. CCRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. CCRV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCICCRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

Volatility

SDCI vs. CCRV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDCICCRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

SDCI vs. CCRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CCRV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDCI vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.80%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDCI and CCRV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SDCI.

SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

SDCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return, while CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SDCI and 0.40% for CCRV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDCI and CCRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer