SDCI vs. FFLC
SDCI (USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Wainwright, Inc., while FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDCI returned 20.46%/yr vs 16.05%/yr for FFLC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDCI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.
Performance
SDCI vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 28.69% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 11.01% return.
SDCI
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 28.69%
- 6M
- 27.00%
- 1Y
- 41.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FFLC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SDCI vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 28.69% | 17.60% | 17.91% | -0.88% | 33.23% | 36.52% | 22.81% |
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 11.01% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDCI and FFLC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SDCI and FFLC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDCI vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDCI
FFLC
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SDCI
FFLC
Basic Materials
SDCI
-
FFLC
Communication Services
SDCI
-
FFLC
Consumer Cyclical
SDCI
-
FFLC
Consumer Defensive
SDCI
-
FFLC
Energy
SDCI
-
FFLC
Healthcare
SDCI
-
FFLC
Industrials
SDCI
-
FFLC
Real Estate
SDCI
-
FFLC
Technology
SDCI
-
FFLC
Utilities
SDCI
-
FFLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDCI vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank
SDCI
FFLC
SDCI vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDCI | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.24 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.16 | 3.06 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 2.93 | +1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.26 | 13.29 | +3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDCI | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.24 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.95 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.18 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
SDCI vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and FFLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDCI | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -19.72% | -26.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -9.98% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | -19.72% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.55% | -19.72% | +1.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | 0.00% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -2.99% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.20% | +0.30% |
Volatility
SDCI vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 3.10%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDCI | FFLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.10% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 9.72% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 12.79% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 16.91% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 17.65% | -0.57% |
SDCI vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDCI vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison
SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than FFLC's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDCI USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund | 2.86% | 3.68% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 33.49% | 19.26% | 0.20% | 0.93% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDCI and FFLC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDCI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FFLC (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs FFLC's -19.72%.
On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.46% vs 16.05% for FFLC. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FFLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 16.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.
SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.99% for FFLC.
SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SDCI and 0.38% for FFLC.
SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDCI and FFLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer