PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDCI vs. FFLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDCI vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDCI achieves a 28.69% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 11.01% return.


SDCI

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
28.69%
6M
27.00%
1Y
41.84%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*

FFLC

1D
0.02%
1M
3.36%
YTD
11.01%
6M
12.12%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDCI vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
28.69%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%22.81%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
11.01%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SDCI and FFLC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.24

The correlation between SDCI and FFLC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDCI vs. FFLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDCI
FFLC

Financial Services

15.4%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.1%

Energy

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

32.3%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Financial Services

SDCI
15.4%
FFLC
11.3%

Basic Materials

SDCI

-

FFLC
1.8%

Communication Services

SDCI

-

FFLC
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SDCI

-

FFLC
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

SDCI

-

FFLC
4.1%

Energy

SDCI

-

FFLC
4.8%

Healthcare

SDCI

-

FFLC
8.1%

Industrials

SDCI

-

FFLC
10.8%

Real Estate

SDCI

-

FFLC
1.1%

Technology

SDCI

-

FFLC
32.3%

Utilities

SDCI

-

FFLC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDCI vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDCI vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDCIFFLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.50

2.24

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.06

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

2.93

+1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.26

13.29

+3.96

SDCI vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDCI and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDCIFFLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.24

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.95

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.18

-0.50

Drawdowns

SDCI vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDCI drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDCI and FFLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDCIFFLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-19.72%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.98%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-19.72%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

-19.72%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

0.00%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-2.99%

-8.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.20%

+0.30%

Volatility

SDCI vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 3.10%. This indicates that SDCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDCIFFLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.10%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

9.72%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

12.79%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

16.91%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.65%

-0.57%

SDCI vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDCI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDCI vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

SDCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than FFLC's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.99%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.86%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDCI and FFLC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FFLC (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDCI dropped -45.79% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

On 5-year performance, SDCI leads with 20.46% vs 16.05% for FFLC. On fees, FFLC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FFLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SDCI has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 16.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFLC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.99% for FFLC.

SDCI is categorized as Commodities, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Wainwright, Inc. and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SDCI and 0.38% for FFLC.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDCI and FFLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer