TILL vs. CERY
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. TILL is actively managed, while CERY is passively managed. Over the past year, TILL returned 6.02% vs 34.74% for CERY. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CERY.
Performance
TILL vs. CERY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 24.55% return.
TILL
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- -5.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CERY
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- YTD
- 24.55%
- 1Y
- 34.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 10.26% | -5.97% | -3.01% |
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.55% | 15.68% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and CERY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
CERY
TILL vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TILL | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 2.43 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 8.78 | -7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TILL vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than CERY's maximum drawdown of -14.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and CERY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -14.33% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -14.33% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.01% | -7.66% | -18.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.59% | -2.59% | -19.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility
TILL vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) is 4.31%, while SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that TILL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CERY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.83% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 13.63% | -2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 15.81% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.84% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 14.84% | -0.11% |
TILL vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than CERY's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.01% | 4.99% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.50% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and CERY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CERY has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to TILL (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs CERY's -14.33%.
On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 34.74% vs 6.02% for TILL. On fees, CERY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 34.74% return vs 6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CERY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.01% for CERY.
They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.28% for CERY.
CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and CERY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer