PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CERY vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 29.80% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 35.70% return.


CERY

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
29.80%
6M
30.47%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PDBC

1D
0.62%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
35.70%
6M
36.33%
1Y
45.92%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CERY vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CERY and PDBC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.92

The correlation between CERY and PDBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CERYPDBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.91

2.48

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

3.17

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.43

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.78

6.80

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.15

14.42

+7.73

CERY vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CERYPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.48

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

0.23

+1.77

Drawdowns

CERY vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-49.52%

+39.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-7.19%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-4.92%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-23.22%

+21.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

3.39%

-1.25%

Volatility

CERY vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) is 5.08%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that CERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CERYPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.45%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

15.78%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

18.70%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

19.12%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.72%

17.78%

-3.06%

CERY vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CERY vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than PDBC's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.85%4.99%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.83%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CERY and PDBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to CERY (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -10.05% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

On 1-year performance, PDBC leads with 45.92% vs 44.49% for CERY. On fees, CERY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, CERY has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 45.92% return vs 44.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CERY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.

CERY has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.83% for PDBC.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.58% for PDBC.

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CERY and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer