CERY vs. BCI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both Commodities funds - CERY tracks the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index while BCI tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CERY returned 38.05% vs 35.51% for BCI. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CERY charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.

Performance

CERY vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than BCI's 22.53% return.

CERY

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 7.79%
• 6M: 15.18%
• YTD: 25.95%
• 1Y: 38.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.32%

BCI

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 7.31%
• 6M: 10.17%
• YTD: 22.53%
• 1Y: 35.51%
• 3Y*: 11.89%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	$33.67M	$55.32M	$39.13M
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	$5.02M	$9.94M	$6.85M

CERY vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	25.95%	15.68%	3.80%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	22.53%	15.07%	6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and BCI is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.92

The correlation between CERY and BCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CERY vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CERY

CERY Risk / Return Rank: 83
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 87
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 76
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CERY vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CERY	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.00	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.60	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.35	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	2.37	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.97	7.60	+1.37

CERY vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and BCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CERY vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CERY	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.33%	-32.69%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-14.82%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.62%	-7.64%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-11.96%	+9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	4.61%	-0.46%

Volatility

CERY vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CERY	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	5.02%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	15.08%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.20%	17.55%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.94%	16.85%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.94%	15.68%	-0.74%

CERY vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

CERY vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than BCI's 13.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.46%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.97%	4.99%	0.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CERY and BCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CERY and BCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CERY or BCI?

BCI has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to CERY (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -14.33% vs BCI's -32.69%.

Which ETF is better, CERY or BCI?

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 38.05% vs 35.51% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CERY or BCI?

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 38.05% return vs 35.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CERY or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CERY or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.46%, compared with 3.97% for CERY.

What is the main difference between CERY and BCI?

CERY tracks Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.26% for BCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.