TERG vs. ATMP
TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TERG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. TERG is actively managed, while ATMP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TERG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.
Performance
TERG vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 97.82% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's 24.32% return.
TERG
- 1D
- -10.40%
- 1M
- -35.99%
- 6M
- 49.85%
- YTD
- 97.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 22.91%
- YTD
- 24.32%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
TERG vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 97.82% | 20.91% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 24.32% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TERG and ATMP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TERG vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ATMP
TERG vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TERG | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TERG vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TERG | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -80.86% | +27.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.47% | -2.70% | -50.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -30.93% | +15.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility
TERG vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TERG | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.06% | 14.62% | +140.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 155.06% | 22.11% | +132.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 155.06% | 27.63% | +127.43% |
TERG vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TERG vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither TERG nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TERG and ATMP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
TERG and ATMP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TERG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ATMP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 0.95% for ATMP.
Find the right allocation for TERG and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer