TERG vs. XXXX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) and XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TERG is actively managed, while XXXX is passively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TERG charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for XXXX.

Performance

TERG vs. XXXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 118.24% return, which is significantly higher than XXXX's 17.80% return.

TERG

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -8.01%
• 6M: 44.99%
• YTD: 118.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XXXX

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -1.64%
• 6M: 14.26%
• YTD: 17.80%
• 1Y: 50.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	$2.08M	$2.39M	$4.94M
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	$20.46M	$24.54M	$27.64M

TERG vs. XXXX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	118.24%	20.91%
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN	17.80%	2.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TERG and XXXX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

TERG vs. XXXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TERG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XXXX

XXXX Risk / Return Rank: 34
XXXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XXXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XXXX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XXXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XXXX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TERG vs. XXXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TERG	XXXX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.08	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.77	—

Drawdowns

TERG vs. XXXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XXXX drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and XXXX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TERG	XXXX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.59%	-62.27%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.67%	-11.53%	-37.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.83%	-11.54%	-7.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TERG	XXXX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	158.05%	50.96%	+107.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	158.05%	60.70%	+97.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	158.05%	60.70%	+97.35%

TERG vs. XXXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XXXX's 2.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TERG vs. XXXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TERG nor XXXX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TERG and XXXX in my portfolio?

TERG and XXXX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TERG or XXXX?

On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TERG or XXXX?

TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TERG or XXXX?

TERG and XXXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TERG and XXXX?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 2.95% for XXXX.