TERG vs. METD
TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TERG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while METD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. TERG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.
Performance
TERG vs. METD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TERG achieves a 97.82% return, which is significantly higher than METD's -5.91% return.
TERG
- 1D
- -10.40%
- 1M
- -35.99%
- 6M
- 49.85%
- YTD
- 97.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METD
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -15.71%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- 0.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TERG vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 97.82% | 20.91% |
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | -5.91% | -7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TERG and METD is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TERG vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
METD
TERG vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TERG | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TERG vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TERG drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TERG and METD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TERG | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -46.03% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.47% | -39.53% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -28.69% | +12.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.24% | — |
Volatility
TERG vs. METD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TERG | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.06% | 38.91% | +116.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 155.06% | 37.47% | +117.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 155.06% | 37.47% | +117.59% |
TERG vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TERG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TERG vs. METD - Dividend Comparison
TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.94% | 3.35% | 2.30% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TERG and METD have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.
METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
TERG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while METD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TERG and 1.00% for METD.
Find the right allocation for TERG and METD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer