TER vs. CLS
TER (Teradyne, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TER in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, TER returned 37.26%/yr vs 43.04%/yr for CLS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TER vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TER achieves a 126.43% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 26.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TER has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 37.26%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.04% annualized return.
TER
- 1D
- 7.19%
- 1M
- 22.17%
- YTD
- 126.43%
- 6M
- 124.55%
- 1Y
- 408.80%
- 3Y*
- 58.59%
- 5Y*
- 29.03%
- 10Y*
- 37.26%
CLS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 26.03%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 175.49%
- 3Y*
- 196.86%
- 5Y*
- 116.85%
- 10Y*
- 43.04%
TER vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 126.43% | 54.39% | 16.51% | 24.78% | -46.35% | 36.81% | 76.73% | 118.93% | -24.37% | 66.16% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 26.03% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TER and CLS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998 | 0.47 |
The correlation between TER and CLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
TER:
$69.03B
CLS:
$43.10B
TER:
$5.38
CLS:
$8.28
TER:
81.46
CLS:
44.97
TER:
18.37
CLS:
3.13
TER:
21.96
CLS:
20.54
TER:
$3.79B
CLS:
$13.81B
TER:
$2.23B
CLS:
$1.60B
TER:
$1.11B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TER vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
TER
CLS
TER vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TER | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.34 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.42 | 5.97 | +9.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 54.89 | 14.26 | +40.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TER vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TER drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TER and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TER | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.30% | -96.93% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.73% | -29.24% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.18% | -53.96% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.12% | -53.96% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -80.60% | +21.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.14% | +21.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.65% | -73.28% | +14.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 12.21% | -4.71% |
Volatility
TER vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teradyne, Inc. (TER) is 25.58%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.00%. This indicates that TER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TER | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.58% | 27.00% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.86% | 53.80% | +0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.76% | 72.73% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.43% | 57.74% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.45% | 50.01% | -4.56% |
Dividends
TER vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% |
Financials
TER vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teradyne, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TER vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TER and CLS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.00%) compared to TER (25.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TER dropped -97.30% vs CLS's -96.93%.
TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.09 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TER and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer