TEMR vs. TCHP
TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and TCHP (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for TCHP.
Performance
TEMR vs. TCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEMR
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TCHP
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 1Y
- 0.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.61M | $10.80M | $11.98M | |
| $55.08K | $37.97K | $35.36K |
TEMR vs. TCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 4.99% |
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMR and TCHP is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMR vs. TCHP — Risk / Return Rank
TEMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TCHP
TEMR vs. TCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMR | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMR vs. TCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, smaller than the maximum TCHP drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and TCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMR | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -42.34% | +28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.32% | -11.41% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -11.33% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility
TEMR vs. TCHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMR | TCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.01% | 17.99% | +15.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 23.68% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 23.17% | +9.84% |
TEMR vs. TCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TCHP's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMR vs. TCHP - Dividend Comparison
Neither TEMR nor TCHP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMR and TCHP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEMR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEMR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.
TEMR and TCHP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while TCHP is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.57% for TCHP.
Find the right allocation for TEMR and TCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer