TEMR vs. TACN

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both Actively Managed funds from T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.

Performance

TEMR vs. TACN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TEMR

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TACN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 8.65%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMR vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF	15.02%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMR and TACN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

TEMR vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TEMR vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and TACN.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEMR	TACN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.74%	-10.98%	+2.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.13%	-1.18%	-4.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-2.42%	-0.19%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TEMR	TACN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.63%	17.59%	+16.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.63%	17.59%	+16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.63%	17.59%	+16.04%

TEMR vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEMR vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEMR nor TACN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEMR and TACN in my portfolio?

TEMR and TACN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TEMR or TACN?

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEMR or TACN?

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEMR or TACN?

TEMR and TACN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TEMR and TACN?

Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.20% for TACN.