PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCHP vs. TSPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCHP vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than TSPA's 11.31% return.


TCHP

1D
-1.29%
1M
3.68%
YTD
3.99%
6M
4.18%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*

TSPA

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.74%
3Y*
22.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCHP vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
3.99%18.40%36.06%50.10%-37.81%10.55%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
11.31%16.44%26.37%29.95%-18.70%13.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and TSPA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.92

The correlation between TCHP and TSPA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

TCHP vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TCHP
TSPA

Technology

47.9%
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.2%
9.9%

Communication Services

15.7%
10.7%

Financial Services

8.0%
12.8%

Healthcare

6.6%
9.5%

Industrials

3.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
5.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.9%

Utilities

0.5%
2.6%

Energy

-

4.1%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

TCHP
47.9%
TSPA
33.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TCHP
16.2%
TSPA
9.9%

Communication Services

TCHP
15.7%
TSPA
10.7%

Financial Services

TCHP
8.0%
TSPA
12.8%

Healthcare

TCHP
6.6%
TSPA
9.5%

Industrials

TCHP
3.6%
TSPA
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

TCHP
0.8%
TSPA
5.0%

Basic Materials

TCHP
0.8%
TSPA
1.9%

Utilities

TCHP
0.5%
TSPA
2.6%

Energy

TCHP

-

TSPA
4.1%

Real Estate

TCHP

-

TSPA
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCHP vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCHP
TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPA
TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCHP vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCHPTSPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

2.28

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

3.12

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.41

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.02

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.84

14.04

-10.20

TCHP vs. TSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the TSPA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and TSPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCHPTSPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.28

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.86

-0.29

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than TSPA's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and TSPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCHPTSPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-24.72%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-9.24%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-19.04%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-0.67%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-5.49%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

1.98%

+3.25%

Volatility

TCHP vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) at 2.98%. This indicates that TCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCHPTSPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

2.98%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

9.44%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

12.26%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

17.00%

+6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

17.00%

+6.18%

TCHP vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCHP vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
0.56%0.62%0.50%0.41%1.16%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCHP and TSPA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCHP has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to TSPA (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs TSPA's -24.72%.

On 3-year performance, TCHP leads with 24.50% vs 22.97% for TSPA. On fees, TSPA is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TCHP has performed better with a 24.50% return vs 22.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSPA is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for TCHP.

TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for TCHP.

TCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for TCHP and 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCHP and TSPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer