PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMR vs. SCSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEMR vs. SCSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TEMR

1D
0.85%
1M
1.80%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCSB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.29%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMR vs. SCSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEMR and SCSB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEMR vs. SCSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond ETF (SCSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEMR vs. SCSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEMR vs. SCSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -8.74%, which is greater than SCSB's maximum drawdown of -0.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and SCSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMRSCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-0.46%

-8.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-0.03%

-6.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-0.09%

-2.52%

Volatility

TEMR vs. SCSB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEMRSCSBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.63%

1.46%

+32.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.63%

1.46%

+32.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.63%

1.46%

+32.17%

TEMR vs. SCSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCSB's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEMR vs. SCSB - Dividend Comparison

TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEMR and SCSB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCSB is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCSB is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TEMR.

SCSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.33% for SCSB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEMR and SCSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer