TEMR vs. ABI
TEMR (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF) and ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while ABI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by VictoryShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TEMR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ABI.
Performance
TEMR vs. ABI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TEMR
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ABI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.68K | $2.70K | $5.15K | |
| $55.08K | $37.97K | $35.36K |
TEMR vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 4.99% |
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMR and ABI is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMR vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank
TEMR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABI
TEMR vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF (TEMR) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEMR | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.99 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEMR vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMR drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMR and ABI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMR | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -0.95% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.32% | 0.00% | -14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.66% | -0.16% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility
TEMR vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMR | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.01% | 1.27% | +31.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 1.25% | +31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 1.25% | +31.76% |
TEMR vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMR vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison
TEMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 6.19% | 3.01% |
TEMR T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Equity Research ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMR and ABI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEMR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEMR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 0.00% for TEMR.
TEMR is categorized as Actively Managed, while ABI is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TEMR and 0.65% for ABI.
Find the right allocation for TEMR and ABI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer