TCHP vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
TCHP is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Aug 4, 2020. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | -10.79% | 18.40% | 36.06% | 50.10% | -37.81% | 18.08% | 11.37% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -7.12% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 22.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a -10.79% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's -7.12% return.
TCHP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FBGRX
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -7.12%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TCHP vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
TCHP
FBGRX
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TCHP | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.13 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.73 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.25 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.00 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | 7.92 | -4.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TCHP | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.13 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between TCHP and FBGRX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCHP T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.05% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCHP | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -58.64% | +16.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -13.89% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | -43.08% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.51% | -8.68% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -12.58% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 3.51% | +1.59% |
Volatility
TCHP vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is 7.12%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that TCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TCHP | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 7.83% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 14.08% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.06% | 24.98% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 24.93% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 23.63% | -0.26% |