PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCHP vs. TBCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCHP achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -3.25% return.


TCHP

1D
1.50%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.12%
YTD
-2.07%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.71%

TBCIX

1D
2.29%
1M
-2.44%
6M
-1.33%
YTD
-3.25%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
16.53%
ALL TIME*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$9.03M$11.03M$11.97M

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
-2.07%18.40%36.06%50.10%-37.81%18.08%11.58%
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
-3.25%18.94%48.73%49.61%-38.48%18.30%11.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TCHP and TBCIX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020

0.98

The correlation between TCHP and TBCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCHP vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TCHP
TCHP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TBCIX
TBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCHPTBCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

0.23

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

0.68

0.00

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is comparable to the TBCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCHP and TBCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCHP drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, roughly equal to the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCHP and TBCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCHPTBCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-43.26%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-16.96%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-23.06%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.34%

-43.26%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.90%

-8.96%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-8.04%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

5.64%

+0.26%

Volatility

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) at 5.92%. This indicates that TCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCHPTBCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

5.92%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

14.30%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.20%

17.67%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

24.16%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

22.85%

+0.33%

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCHP has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCHP vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison

TCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TBCIX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class
5.38%5.20%18.28%3.47%5.84%10.03%1.18%0.59%2.50%3.05%0.81%
TCHP
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TCHP and TBCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCHP has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to TBCIX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCHP dropped -42.34% vs TBCIX's -43.26%.

TCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCHP and TBCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer