TDVG vs. SPYG
TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. TDVG is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDVG returned 10.19%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SPYG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TDVG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return.
TDVG
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
TDVG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 8.04% | 14.80% | 13.45% | 13.95% | -10.15% | 26.20% | 12.97% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDVG and SPYG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between TDVG and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TDVG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDVG
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
TDVG
SPYG
Financial Services
TDVG
SPYG
Industrials
TDVG
SPYG
Healthcare
TDVG
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
TDVG
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
TDVG
SPYG
Energy
TDVG
SPYG
Utilities
TDVG
SPYG
Basic Materials
TDVG
SPYG
Real Estate
TDVG
SPYG
Communication Services
TDVG
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDVG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TDVG
SPYG
TDVG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDVG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.96 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 7.79 | +2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDVG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDVG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -67.63% | +48.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -13.76% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -22.14% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -32.67% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -5.52% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -24.28% | +20.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 3.46% | -1.70% |
Volatility
TDVG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.78%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDVG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 7.26% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 13.90% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 17.26% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 21.36% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 20.73% | -6.83% |
TDVG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDVG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDVG and SPYG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.11% vs 10.19% for TDVG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.04% for SPYG.
TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDVG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer