PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDVG vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDVG vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.06% return.


TDVG

1D
0.86%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.35%
1Y
17.75%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.83%
1M
2.63%
YTD
9.06%
6M
10.08%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDVG vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
7.68%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%26.20%12.98%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.06%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TDVG and DGRO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020

0.95

The correlation between TDVG and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

TDVG vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TDVG
DGRO

Technology

24.1%
19.4%

Financial Services

19.5%
21.2%

Industrials

13.6%
10.8%

Healthcare

12.9%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
11.5%

Energy

5.8%
5.6%

Utilities

3.9%
6.9%

Basic Materials

2.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Communication Services

1.2%
0.1%

Technology

TDVG
24.1%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

TDVG
19.5%
DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

TDVG
13.6%
DGRO
10.8%

Healthcare

TDVG
12.9%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TDVG
7.7%
DGRO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

TDVG
7.1%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

TDVG
5.8%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

TDVG
3.9%
DGRO
6.9%

Basic Materials

TDVG
2.9%
DGRO
2.5%

Real Estate

TDVG
1.6%
DGRO

-

Communication Services

TDVG
1.2%
DGRO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDVG vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDVG vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDVGDGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.51

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.64

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.71

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.27

14.35

-4.09

TDVG vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDVG and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDVGDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.51

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.77

+0.18

Drawdowns

TDVG vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDVGDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-35.10%

+15.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-6.47%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-14.03%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.20%

-19.31%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-3.45%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.67%

+0.09%

Volatility

TDVG vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDVGDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

2.36%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

6.96%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

9.47%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.82%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

16.63%

-2.70%

TDVG vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDVG vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DGRO's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.95%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TDVG and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to TDVG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.72% vs 10.19% for TDVG. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDVG and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer