TDVG vs. VIG
TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. TDVG is actively managed, while VIG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDVG returned 10.19%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for VIG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
TDVG vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TDVG having a 7.68% return and VIG slightly higher at 7.77%.
TDVG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
VIG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
TDVG vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 7.68% | 14.80% | 13.45% | 13.95% | -10.15% | 26.20% | 12.98% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.77% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 13.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDVG and VIG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between TDVG and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
TDVG vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDVG
VIG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
TDVG
VIG
Financial Services
TDVG
VIG
Industrials
TDVG
VIG
Healthcare
TDVG
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
TDVG
VIG
Consumer Defensive
TDVG
VIG
Energy
TDVG
VIG
Utilities
TDVG
VIG
Basic Materials
TDVG
VIG
Real Estate
TDVG
VIG
-
Communication Services
TDVG
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDVG vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
TDVG
VIG
TDVG vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDVG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.07 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.01 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 2.67 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 10.82 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDVG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.07 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.60 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
TDVG vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDVG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -46.81% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -7.91% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -14.95% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -20.39% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -5.52% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.96% | -0.20% |
Volatility
TDVG vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDVG | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.32% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 7.64% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 10.01% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.23% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 16.05% | -2.12% |
TDVG vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDVG vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VIG's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TDVG and VIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIG has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to TDVG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 5-year performance, VIG leads with 10.78% vs 10.19% for TDVG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VIG has performed better with a 10.78% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.
TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VIG is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDVG and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer