TDVG vs. SCHD
TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. TDVG is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDVG returned 10.19%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TDVG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
TDVG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDVG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
TDVG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
TDVG vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 7.68% | 14.80% | 13.45% | 13.95% | -10.15% | 26.20% | 12.98% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 17.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDVG and SCHD is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TDVG and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TDVG vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TDVG
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
TDVG
SCHD
Financial Services
TDVG
SCHD
Industrials
TDVG
SCHD
Healthcare
TDVG
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
TDVG
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
TDVG
SCHD
Energy
TDVG
SCHD
Utilities
TDVG
SCHD
Basic Materials
TDVG
SCHD
Real Estate
TDVG
SCHD
-
Communication Services
TDVG
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDVG vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
TDVG
SCHD
TDVG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDVG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 3.98 | -1.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.46 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 6.17 | -3.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 15.20 | -4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDVG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.59 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.86 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
TDVG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDVG drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDVG and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDVG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -33.37% | +14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -4.61% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | -16.13% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -16.85% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -3.32% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.87% | -0.11% |
Volatility
TDVG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) is 2.26%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that TDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDVG | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.92% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 7.66% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 10.96% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.38% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 16.72% | -2.79% |
TDVG vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDVG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDVG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
TDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDVG and SCHD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to TDVG (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDVG dropped -19.20% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, TDVG leads with 10.19% vs 8.49% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.
TDVG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDVG and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDVG and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer