TAGS vs. CANE
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE).
TAGS and CANE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAGS is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium TAGS Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2012. CANE is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. Both TAGS and CANE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TAGS vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAGS vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 10.65% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 7.02% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGS has underperformed CANE with an annualized return of -0.44%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.05% annualized return.
TAGS
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 0.50%
- 3Y*
- -6.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
CANE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -14.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAGS vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
CANE
TAGS vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | -0.75 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | -1.01 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.89 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | -0.53 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | -0.79 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | -0.75 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.40 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | -0.25 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and CANE is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TAGS vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
Neither TAGS nor CANE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, smaller than the maximum CANE drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and CANE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -81.30% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -28.86% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -41.73% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | -67.29% | +19.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.14% | -60.32% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.15% | -56.42% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 19.23% | -11.64% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 4.78%, while Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 7.27% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 14.43% | -5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 19.42% | -7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 20.96% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 21.79% | -3.45% |