SRS vs. NOBL
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -15.86%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
SRS vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -19.00% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -15.86%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.56% annualized return.
SRS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -19.00%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- -11.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.57%
- 10Y*
- -15.86%
NOBL
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
SRS vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -19.00% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -38.97% | 6.01% | -18.03% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.33% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and NOBL is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | -0.68 |
The correlation between SRS and NOBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
NOBL
SRS vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 1.33 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 3.36 | -4.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -35.43% | -64.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -9.11% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -15.36% | -37.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -17.92% | -35.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.30% | -35.43% | -50.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -2.44% | -97.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.26% | -3.47% | -87.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.22% | 3.59% | +7.63% |
Volatility
SRS vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 10.31% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 4.11%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 4.11% | +6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 8.54% | +13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 11.67% | +17.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 14.43% | +23.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 16.60% | +24.19% |
SRS vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than NOBL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.56% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and NOBL have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to NOBL (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.56% vs -15.86% for SRS. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.56% return vs -15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while NOBL is Dividend. SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer