SRS vs. SPMO
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -15.88%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for SPMO. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
SRS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -20.93% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of -15.88%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.
SRS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -16.96%
- YTD
- -20.93%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.60%
- 10Y*
- -15.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.32%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $331.54M | $346.70M | $350.59M | |
| $359.74K | $355.42K | $364.28K |
SRS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -20.93% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -38.97% | 6.01% | -18.03% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 21.07% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and SPMO is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | -0.40 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SRS and SPMO has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.40 to -0.01, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
SPMO
SRS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.21 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.63 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 5.93 | -7.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -30.95% | -69.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.73% | -15.64% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.73% | -20.13% | -34.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.73% | -22.74% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -30.95% | -55.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -11.03% | -88.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -4.62% | -86.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.39% | 4.29% | +8.10% |
Volatility
SRS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is 8.83%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that SRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 10.53% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 21.52% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.47% | 23.90% | +4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.79% | 20.60% | +17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 20.92% | +19.89% |
SRS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than SPMO's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.65% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and SPMO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to SRS (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 19.57% vs -15.88% for SRS. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SRS has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 19.57% return vs -15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.73% for SPMO.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while SPMO is Momentum. SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer