PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 30.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYG having a 18.20% annualized return and SPHB not far ahead at 18.92%.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SPHB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2011

0.79

The correlation between SPYG and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SPHB

Technology

51.9%
45.8%

Communication Services

16.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
12.9%

Financial Services

8.5%
12.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
2.9%

Industrials

5.0%
11.7%

Utilities

1.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
4.6%

Energy

0.1%
2.2%

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
SPHB
45.8%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
SPHB
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
SPHB
12.9%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
SPHB
12.5%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
SPHB
2.9%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
SPHB
11.7%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
SPHB
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SPHB
0.6%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
SPHB

-

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SPHB
4.6%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SPHB
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

6.52

-4.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

25.92

-15.67

SPYG vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGSPHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.16

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.56

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.67

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.53

-0.17

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SPHB's maximum drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-46.84%

-20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-10.70%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-29.21%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-31.49%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-46.84%

+14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.67%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-8.50%

-15.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.69%

+0.63%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 4.35%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

7.14%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

16.99%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

22.16%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

27.38%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

28.45%

-7.81%

SPYG vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SPHB's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and SPHB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.92% vs 18.20% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 18.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer