PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. SPGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. SPGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPGP's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed SPGP with an annualized return of 17.94%, while SPGP has yielded a comparatively lower 15.12% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.41%
6M
15.81%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
17.94%
ALL TIME*
13.56%

SPGP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.78%
6M
9.37%
YTD
10.71%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
15.12%
ALL TIME*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.85M$11.53M$9.19M
$46.45M$55.30M$54.87M

SPHB vs. SPGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
19.95%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
10.71%9.80%8.48%20.29%-13.83%35.72%15.92%39.16%1.68%36.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and SPGP is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.77

The correlation between SPHB and SPGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHB vs. SPGP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
SPGP

Technology

45.0%
22.6%

Financial Services

14.9%
30.5%

Industrials

13.0%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
12.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
9.8%

Utilities

3.5%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.6%

Communication Services

1.6%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
1.0%

Energy

0.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

SPHB
45.0%
SPGP
22.6%

Financial Services

SPHB
14.9%
SPGP
30.5%

Industrials

SPHB
13.0%
SPGP
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
10.6%
SPGP
12.8%

Healthcare

SPHB
5.9%
SPGP
9.8%

Utilities

SPHB
3.5%
SPGP
2.7%

Basic Materials

SPHB
2.3%
SPGP
1.6%

Communication Services

SPHB
1.6%
SPGP
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.9%
SPGP
1.0%

Energy

SPHB
0.8%
SPGP
1.2%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

SPGP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. SPGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGP
SPGP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SPGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPHB vs. SPGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHBSPGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.45

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

5.55

+4.31

SPHB vs. SPGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the SPGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and SPGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. SPGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than SPGP's maximum drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBSPGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-42.08%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-11.15%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-22.87%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-22.87%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-42.08%

-4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-0.44%

-10.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-4.32%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

2.91%

+0.85%

Volatility

SPHB vs. SPGP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) at 3.74%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBSPGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

3.74%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

12.26%

+9.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.09%

15.82%

+10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

18.64%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

21.21%

+7.36%

SPHB vs. SPGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGP's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHB vs. SPGP - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than SPGP's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGP
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
0.80%1.04%1.38%1.24%1.22%0.69%1.10%0.86%0.95%0.68%0.89%1.12%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.58%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and SPGP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to SPGP (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPGP's -42.08%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 17.94% vs 15.12% for SPGP. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 15.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.

SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while SPGP is Multi-factor. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.36% for SPGP.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer