SPHB vs. SPGP
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and SPGP (Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPGP is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 GARP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHB returned 19.46%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for SPGP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SPGP.
Performance
SPHB vs. SPGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 29.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPGP's 5.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed SPGP with an annualized return of 19.46%, while SPGP has yielded a comparatively lower 15.37% annualized return.
SPHB
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 29.05%
- 6M
- 26.31%
- 1Y
- 62.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 19.46%
SPGP
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.37%
SPHB vs. SPGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 29.05% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 5.38% | 9.80% | 8.48% | 20.29% | -13.83% | 35.72% | 15.92% | 39.16% | 1.68% | 36.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and SPGP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SPHB and SPGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHB vs. SPGP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
SPGP
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
SPGP
Industrials
SPHB
SPGP
Financial Services
SPHB
SPGP
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
SPGP
Healthcare
SPHB
SPGP
Communication Services
SPHB
SPGP
Basic Materials
SPHB
SPGP
-
Utilities
SPHB
SPGP
-
Energy
SPHB
SPGP
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
SPGP
-
Real Estate
SPHB
-
SPGP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. SPGP — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
SPGP
SPHB vs. SPGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | SPGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.18 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.90 | 1.40 | +4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.17 | 5.34 | +16.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. SPGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than SPGP's maximum drawdown of -42.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | SPGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -42.08% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -11.15% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -22.87% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -22.87% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -42.08% | -4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -1.69% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -4.35% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.92% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. SPGP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF (SPGP) at 5.41%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | SPGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.78% | 5.41% | +6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.72% | 12.33% | +7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 15.77% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 18.62% | +9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.54% | 21.22% | +7.32% |
SPHB vs. SPGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGP's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHB vs. SPGP - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPGP's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPGP Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF | 0.85% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 1.24% | 1.22% | 0.69% | 1.10% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.89% | 1.12% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and SPGP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SPGP (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPGP's -42.08%.
On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 19.46% vs 15.37% for SPGP. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPGP has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 19.46% return vs 15.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SPGP.
SPGP has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.54% for SPHB.
SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while SPGP is Multi-factor. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPGP tracks S&P 500 GARP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.36% for SPGP.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer