PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPHB having a 34.45% return and SPMO slightly higher at 36.08%. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 19.96%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
1.23%
1M
10.55%
YTD
34.45%
6M
31.05%
1Y
70.74%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
19.96%

SPMO

1D
1.26%
1M
11.71%
YTD
36.08%
6M
35.05%
1Y
52.78%
3Y*
44.69%
5Y*
24.25%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
34.45%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
36.08%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and SPMO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.62

The correlation between SPHB and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHB vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
SPMO

Technology

46.2%
56.8%

Industrials

14.8%
10.9%

Financial Services

13.2%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
1.1%

Healthcare

4.9%
5.9%

Communication Services

2.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Energy

2.2%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

SPHB
46.2%
SPMO
56.8%

Industrials

SPHB
14.8%
SPMO
10.9%

Financial Services

SPHB
13.2%
SPMO
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
12.7%
SPMO
1.1%

Healthcare

SPHB
4.9%
SPMO
5.9%

Communication Services

SPHB
2.5%
SPMO
8.0%

Basic Materials

SPHB
2.4%
SPMO
1.5%

Utilities

SPHB
2.4%
SPMO
2.6%

Energy

SPHB
2.2%
SPMO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.9%
SPMO
3.8%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

SPMO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHBSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

4.18

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.09

15.78

+9.31

SPHB vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-30.95%

-15.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-12.70%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-20.13%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-22.74%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-30.95%

-15.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-4.59%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.35%

-0.52%

Volatility

SPHB vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 10.87% and 10.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.87%

10.55%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

17.11%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

20.05%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

19.77%

+7.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.59%

20.55%

+8.04%

SPHB vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHB vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than SPMO's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.62%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.78%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and SPMO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to SPMO (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.59% vs 19.96% for SPHB. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 19.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.62% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while SPMO is Momentum. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer