PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHB vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHB vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has outperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 18.26%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.94% annualized return.


SPHB

1D
-2.52%
1M
-1.92%
6M
18.87%
YTD
24.96%
1Y
44.79%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
18.26%

XSVM

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.41%
6M
18.51%
YTD
23.59%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHB vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
24.96%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%17.87%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
23.59%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHB and XSVM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between SPHB and XSVM has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPHB vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHB
XSVM

Technology

43.7%
2.9%

Financial Services

14.5%
42.7%

Industrials

13.1%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
15.6%

Healthcare

6.2%
1.7%

Utilities

3.2%
2.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.2%

Communication Services

1.7%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
1.8%

Energy

0.8%
5.7%

Real Estate

-

7.7%

Technology

SPHB
43.7%
XSVM
2.9%

Financial Services

SPHB
14.5%
XSVM
42.7%

Industrials

SPHB
13.1%
XSVM
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHB
9.9%
XSVM
15.6%

Healthcare

SPHB
6.2%
XSVM
1.7%

Utilities

SPHB
3.2%
XSVM
2.1%

Basic Materials

SPHB
2.4%
XSVM
4.2%

Communication Services

SPHB
1.7%
XSVM
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPHB
0.9%
XSVM
1.8%

Energy

SPHB
0.8%
XSVM
5.7%

Real Estate

SPHB

-

XSVM
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHB vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHB vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPHBXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.27

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

10.11

+4.71

SPHB vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHB Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHB and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPHB vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHBXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-62.57%

+15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-10.08%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.21%

-26.21%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.49%

-26.21%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-49.02%

+2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.06%

-0.71%

-6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-11.51%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.25%

-0.22%

Volatility

SPHB vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) at 4.40%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHBXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.33%

4.40%

+6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.68%

12.24%

+8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.22%

18.22%

+7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.83%

22.46%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.50%

25.00%

+3.50%

SPHB vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPHB vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than XSVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.56%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHB and XSVM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to XSVM (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 10-year performance, SPHB leads with 18.26% vs 12.94% for XSVM. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 12.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.56% for SPHB.

SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while XSVM is Momentum. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHB and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer