SPHB vs. QQQ
SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHB returned 19.96%/yr vs 22.48%/yr for QQQ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPHB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SPHB vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHB achieves a 34.45% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHB has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 19.96%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.48% annualized return.
SPHB
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 34.45%
- 6M
- 31.05%
- 1Y
- 70.74%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 19.96%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
SPHB vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 34.45% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 17.87% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.41% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHB and QQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPHB and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (10 years) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPHB vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHB
QQQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHB
QQQ
Industrials
SPHB
QQQ
Financial Services
SPHB
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPHB
QQQ
Healthcare
SPHB
QQQ
Communication Services
SPHB
QQQ
Basic Materials
SPHB
QQQ
Utilities
SPHB
QQQ
Energy
SPHB
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SPHB
QQQ
Real Estate
SPHB
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHB vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPHB
QQQ
SPHB vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.64 | 3.44 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.09 | 12.79 | +12.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHB vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHB drawdown since its inception was -46.84%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHB and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -82.97% | +36.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -11.96% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.21% | -22.77% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -35.12% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -35.12% | -11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.99% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -32.73% | +24.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.21% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SPHB vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that SPHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHB | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 8.47% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 14.20% | +5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.98% | 17.67% | +6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 22.64% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.59% | 22.43% | +6.16% |
SPHB vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHB vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.62% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHB and QQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHB dropped -46.84% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.48% vs 19.96% for SPHB. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 19.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPHB.
SPHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.
SPHB is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SPHB and 0.18% for QQQ.
SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHB and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer