PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. RPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 31.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed RPG with an annualized return of 18.20%, while RPG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.81% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%

RPG

1D
0.16%
1M
11.54%
YTD
31.51%
6M
32.14%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
14.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
31.51%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and RPG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006

0.90

The correlation between SPYG and RPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
RPG

Technology

51.9%
39.6%

Communication Services

16.8%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
17.1%

Financial Services

8.5%
5.2%

Healthcare

5.8%
7.0%

Industrials

5.0%
17.6%

Utilities

1.2%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.5%

Energy

0.1%
1.4%

Technology

SPYG
51.9%
RPG
39.6%

Communication Services

SPYG
16.8%
RPG
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.9%
RPG
17.1%

Financial Services

SPYG
8.5%
RPG
5.2%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.8%
RPG
7.0%

Industrials

SPYG
5.0%
RPG
17.6%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
RPG
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
RPG
1.1%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
RPG
1.1%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
RPG
1.5%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
RPG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYGRPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.72

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

14.56

-4.30

SPYG vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYGRPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.09

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.56

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.65

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.54

-0.19

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than RPG's maximum drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and RPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGRPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-53.27%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-11.08%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-24.75%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-35.59%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-36.58%

+3.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

-8.84%

-15.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.83%

+0.49%

Volatility

SPYG vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 4.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGRPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

6.43%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

16.26%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

19.73%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

23.44%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

22.70%

-2.06%

SPYG vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYG vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.17%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYG and RPG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs RPG's -53.27%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.20% vs 14.81% for RPG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.20% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.35% for RPG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and RPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer