RPG vs. RSP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 13.40%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

RPG vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has outperformed RSP with an annualized return of 13.40%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.94% annualized return.

RPG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -6.42%
• 6M: 14.71%
• YTD: 19.96%
• 1Y: 21.88%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 13.40%
• ALL TIME*: 11.54%

RSP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 9.43%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 11.94%
• ALL TIME*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	$39.18M	$42.11M	$41.32M
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	$1.86B	$1.85B	$2.06B

RPG vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	19.96%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	28.34%	-4.53%	26.20%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	13.16%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and RSP is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between RPG and RSP has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RPG vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPG	RSP
Technology	47.7%	16.9%
Industrials	15.7%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	9.5%
Communication Services	7.0%	3.3%
Healthcare	6.2%	11.8%
Financial Services	5.0%	14.8%
Energy	1.5%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	6.2%
Basic Materials	1.1%	4.6%
Real Estate	1.0%	6.0%
Utilities	1.0%	6.6%

Return for Risk

RPG vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 35
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPG vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RPG	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	1.63	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	2.38	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.29	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	2.43	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.81	9.43	-4.62

RPG vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RPG vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPG	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-59.92%	+6.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.84%	-7.85%	-8.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	-17.81%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	-21.38%	-14.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.58%	-39.04%	+2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.37%	-1.23%	-11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-6.61%	-2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	2.02%	+2.05%

Volatility

RPG vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPG	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.64%	2.88%	+7.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	8.59%	+13.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.88%	11.76%	+13.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.40%	16.16%	+8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.17%	18.28%	+4.89%

RPG vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPG vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than RSP's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPG and RSP in my portfolio?

RPG and RSP have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPG or RSP?

RPG has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, RPG or RSP?

On 10-year performance, RPG leads with 13.40% vs 11.94% for RSP. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPG or RSP?

Over the 10-year period, RPG has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPG or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPG or RSP?

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

What is the main difference between RPG and RSP?

RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. RPG tracks S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.