PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.40%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.


RPG

1D
0.13%
1M
-6.42%
6M
14.71%
YTD
19.96%
1Y
21.88%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
13.40%
ALL TIME*
11.54%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B
$39.18M$42.11M$41.32M

RPG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
19.96%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and QQQ is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006

0.86

The correlation between RPG and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPG
QQQ

Technology

47.7%
60.9%

Industrials

15.7%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
10.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
13.1%

Healthcare

6.2%
3.6%

Financial Services

5.0%
0.2%

Energy

1.5%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
6.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Utilities

1.0%
1.1%

Technology

RPG
47.7%
QQQ
60.9%

Industrials

RPG
15.7%
QQQ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

RPG
14.4%
QQQ
10.7%

Communication Services

RPG
7.0%
QQQ
13.1%

Healthcare

RPG
6.2%
QQQ
3.6%

Financial Services

RPG
5.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Energy

RPG
1.5%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

RPG
1.1%
QQQ
6.3%

Basic Materials

RPG
1.1%
QQQ
1.0%

Real Estate

RPG
1.0%
QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

RPG
1.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

1.88

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.81

6.00

-1.18

RPG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

-82.97%

+29.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.84%

-11.96%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-22.77%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-35.12%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.58%

-35.12%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.37%

-7.69%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-32.62%

+23.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

3.74%

+0.33%

Volatility

RPG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

6.87%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.14%

16.08%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.88%

19.38%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.40%

22.90%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

22.50%

+0.67%

RPG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.17%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPG has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.44% vs 13.40% for RPG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.44% return vs 13.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. RPG tracks S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer