RPG vs. VUG
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - RPG tracks the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 13.40%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
RPG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, RPG has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 13.40%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.
RPG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 21.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.54%
VUG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.18M | $42.11M | $41.32M | |
| $556.11M | $661.72M | $650.91M |
RPG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 19.96% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 28.34% | -4.53% | 26.20% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.02% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and VUG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RPG and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RPG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPG
VUG
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
RPG
VUG
Industrials
RPG
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
RPG
VUG
Communication Services
RPG
VUG
Healthcare
RPG
VUG
Financial Services
RPG
VUG
Energy
RPG
VUG
Consumer Defensive
RPG
VUG
Basic Materials
RPG
VUG
Real Estate
RPG
VUG
Utilities
RPG
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
VUG
RPG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.78 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 2.47 | +2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -50.68% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -16.53% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -22.85% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -35.61% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | -35.61% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.37% | -5.53% | -6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -7.08% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 5.20% | -1.13% |
Volatility
RPG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.58%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.64% | 5.58% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 14.24% | +7.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 17.74% | +7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 22.49% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.17% | 21.55% | +1.62% |
RPG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VUG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and VUG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to VUG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.38% vs 13.40% for RPG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 13.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.
RPG tracks S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.03% for VUG.
RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPG and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer