SPYG vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 17.91%/yr vs 35.67%/yr for QLD. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

SPYG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 32.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 17.91%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.67% annualized return.

SPYG

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -2.81%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 25.85%
• 5Y*: 14.92%
• 10Y*: 17.91%

QLD

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 32.65%
• 6M: 32.82%
• 1Y: 73.89%
• 3Y*: 44.57%
• 5Y*: 23.24%
• 10Y*: 35.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	9.70%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	32.65%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and QLD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006	0.94

The correlation between SPYG and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYG	QLD
Technology	53.2%	58.7%
Communication Services	16.1%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	11.4%
Financial Services	8.4%	0.2%
Healthcare	5.8%	3.7%
Industrials	5.1%	2.6%
Utilities	1.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	6.4%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.1%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.0%
Energy	0.1%	0.5%

Return for Risk

SPYG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 64
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYG	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.04	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.48	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.78	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	9.46	-1.38

SPYG vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYG	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.63%	-83.13%	+15.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.76%	-25.13%	+11.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.14%	-42.29%	+20.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.67%	-63.68%	+31.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.67%	-63.68%	+31.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.65%	-7.11%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.30%	-18.16%	-6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	7.36%	-3.94%

Volatility

SPYG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is 6.33%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that SPYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYG	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	15.14%	-8.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	27.51%	-14.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	34.29%	-17.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	45.07%	-23.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.70%	44.73%	-24.03%

SPYG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYG and QLD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SPYG and QLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPYG or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, SPYG or QLD?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 35.67% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYG or QLD?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 35.67% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYG or QLD?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYG or QLD?

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between SPYG and QLD?

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.