PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 9.97%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.58% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
-1.65%
1M
-1.67%
6M
8.66%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
9.97%

SPYG

1D
-1.58%
1M
1.15%
6M
9.34%
YTD
10.97%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
17.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
12.94%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
10.97%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and SPYG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007

0.74

The correlation between SPDW and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
SPYG

Financial Services

22.2%
8.9%

Industrials

18.4%
5.2%

Technology

16.8%
52.0%

Healthcare

7.9%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.5%

Basic Materials

7.3%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
1.0%

Energy

4.9%
0.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
15.9%

Utilities

3.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.6%

Financial Services

SPDW
22.2%
SPYG
8.9%

Industrials

SPDW
18.4%
SPYG
5.2%

Technology

SPDW
16.8%
SPYG
52.0%

Healthcare

SPDW
7.9%
SPYG
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
SPYG
8.5%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
SPYG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.4%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

SPDW
4.9%
SPYG
0.1%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.9%
SPYG
15.9%

Utilities

SPDW
3.0%
SPYG
1.2%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.3%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDWSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

1.74

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

6.69

+2.08

SPDW vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-67.63%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-13.76%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-22.14%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-32.67%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-32.67%

-2.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-3.55%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-24.24%

+11.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.58%

-0.56%

Volatility

SPDW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 6.27% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

6.43%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

14.28%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

17.49%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

21.42%

-4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

20.73%

-3.64%

SPDW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPDW and SPYG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than SPYG's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
3.07%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.49%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDW and SPYG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SPDW (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.58% vs 9.97% for SPDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.58% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW and SPYG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 0.49% for SPYG.

SPDW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer