SPDW vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
SPDW and SCHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPDW is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2007. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both SPDW and SCHF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPDW or SCHF.
Key characteristics
| SPDW | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.82% | 2.90% |
| 1Y Return | 9.45% | 9.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.33% | 2.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.24% | 6.49% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.55% | 4.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.54% | 12.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.02% | -34.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.59% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDW and SCHF is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPDW vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPDW having a 2.82% return and SCHF slightly higher at 2.90%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPDW having a 4.55% annualized return and SCHF not far ahead at 4.59%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPDW vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPDW vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPDW vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than SCHF's 2.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.67% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 2.36% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 2.90% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
SPDW vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and SCHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPDW vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.