SPDW vs. SCHF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index while SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDW returned 10.02%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for SCHF. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SPDW charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.

Performance

SPDW vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPDW having a 14.31% return and SCHF slightly higher at 14.79%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPDW having a 10.02% annualized return and SCHF not far ahead at 10.18%.

SPDW

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 8.06%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 9.68%
• 10Y*: 10.02%
• ALL TIME*: 5.09%

SCHF

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 8.48%
• YTD: 14.79%
• 1Y: 30.87%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 10.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	$215.25M	$219.24M	$213.98M
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	$139.26M	$163.06M	$165.12M

SPDW vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	14.31%	34.75%	3.55%	17.81%	-15.98%	11.45%	9.90%	22.41%	-14.22%	25.81%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	14.79%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	22.26%	-14.29%	26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and SCHF is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009	0.98

The correlation between SPDW and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPDW	SCHF
Financial Services	18.0%	25.6%
Industrials	10.6%	14.3%
Technology	9.5%	16.4%
Healthcare	6.3%	7.1%
Basic Materials	5.4%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	6.3%
Energy	4.9%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	5.1%
Communication Services	1.8%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%
Utilities	1.4%	3.2%

Return for Risk

SPDW vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 76
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDW vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPDW	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.75	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.42	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.65	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	9.84	-0.16

SPDW vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDW	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.02%	-34.87%	-25.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-11.48%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.53%	-13.41%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.21%	-29.14%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.98%	-34.87%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-2.45%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-7.33%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.08%	-0.03%

Volatility

SPDW vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDW	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	5.38%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.21%	15.48%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	17.39%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	16.70%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	17.05%	+0.08%

SPDW vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPDW vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than SCHF's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.07%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	3.03%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDW and SCHF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, SPDW and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPDW or SCHF?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SPDW (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which ETF is better, SPDW or SCHF?

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.18% vs 10.02% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPDW has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDW or SCHF?

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.18% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDW or SCHF?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDW or SCHF?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 3.03% for SPDW.

What is the main difference between SPDW and SCHF?

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.06% for SCHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.