PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPDW having a 16.78% return and VEA slightly lower at 16.69%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPDW having a 10.97% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 11.06%.


SPDW

1D
0.06%
1M
3.29%
YTD
16.78%
6M
17.39%
1Y
35.21%
3Y*
20.66%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
10.97%

VEA

1D
0.11%
1M
3.28%
YTD
16.69%
6M
17.33%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
16.78%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.69%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and VEA is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.95

The correlation between SPDW and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
VEA

Financial Services

22.2%
22.3%

Industrials

18.4%
17.5%

Technology

16.8%
16.6%

Healthcare

7.9%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
7.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.5%

Energy

4.9%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
3.2%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.5%

Financial Services

SPDW
22.2%
VEA
22.3%

Industrials

SPDW
18.4%
VEA
17.5%

Technology

SPDW
16.8%
VEA
16.6%

Healthcare

SPDW
7.9%
VEA
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
VEA
7.4%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.4%
VEA
5.5%

Energy

SPDW
4.9%
VEA
4.7%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.9%
VEA
3.2%

Utilities

SPDW
3.0%
VEA
3.0%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.3%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDWVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.06

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

11.80

+0.05

SPDW vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-60.68%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-11.63%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-13.45%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-29.71%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-35.73%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-13.26%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.01%

-0.03%

Volatility

SPDW vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 6.31% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.32%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

14.39%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

16.52%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

16.71%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

17.38%

-0.10%

SPDW vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDW vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than VEA's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
4.28%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.50%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SPDW and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to SPDW (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 11.06% vs 10.97% for SPDW. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.50% for VEA.

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer