SPDW vs. IXUS
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS).
SPDW and IXUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SPDW is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2007. IXUS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both SPDW and IXUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SPDW or IXUS.
Key characteristics
| SPDW | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.47% | 1.97% |
| 1Y Return | 10.38% | 9.89% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.20% | -0.44% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.18% | 5.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.61% | 4.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.68 | 0.80 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.62% | 12.52% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.02% | -36.23% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.92% | -4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDW and IXUS is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SPDW vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than IXUS's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has outperformed IXUS with an annualized return of 4.61%, while IXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SPDW vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IXUS's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SPDW vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SPDW vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison
SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than IXUS's 3.07% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.68% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 2.36% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 3.07% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.11% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.40% | 2.57% | 2.80% | 2.95% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
SPDW vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and IXUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SPDW vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) have volatilities of 3.34% and 3.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.