SNSR vs. QQH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index while QQH tracks the HCM Defender 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.51%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for QQH. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for QQH.

Performance

SNSR vs. QQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than QQH's 14.78% return.

SNSR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 19.62%
• YTD: 44.93%
• 6M: 43.21%
• 1Y: 49.79%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

QQH

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 14.19%
• YTD: 14.78%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 40.27%
• 3Y*: 26.06%
• 5Y*: 15.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. QQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	44.93%	6.46%	-0.45%	23.06%	-25.50%	23.66%	35.05%	17.46%
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	14.78%	15.66%	33.64%	48.05%	-39.60%	37.52%	41.71%	15.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and QQH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019	0.73

The correlation between SNSR and QQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. QQH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNSR	QQH
Technology	78.7%	56.6%
Industrials	15.7%	2.2%
Healthcare	4.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	0.8%	14.9%
Basic Materials	0.2%	1.0%
Utilities	0.1%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

SNSR vs. QQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 51
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNSR	QQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.97	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.53	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	2.50	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	6.81	+4.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNSR vs. QQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the QQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and QQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNSR	QQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.97	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.71	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.85	-0.26

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum QQH drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and QQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNSR	QQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-41.87%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-16.18%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	-24.84%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	-41.87%	+3.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.56%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-12.94%	+3.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	5.93%	-1.33%

Volatility

SNSR vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) at 6.03%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNSR	QQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	6.03%	+3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.55%	14.47%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	20.57%	+3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.16%	21.51%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	24.73%	-0.06%

SNSR vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNSR vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than QQH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.18%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.37%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNSR and QQH in my portfolio?

SNSR and QQH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNSR or QQH?

SNSR has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to QQH (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs QQH's -41.87%.

Which ETF is better, SNSR or QQH?

On 5-year performance, QQH leads with 15.09% vs 9.51% for SNSR. On fees, SNSR is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNSR or QQH?

Over the 5-year period, QQH has performed better with a 15.09% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNSR or QQH?

SNSR is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNSR or QQH?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.18% for QQH.

What is the main difference between SNSR and QQH?

SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Howard Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 1.14% for QQH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.