PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSR vs. QQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SNSR vs. QQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SNSR vs. QQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
1.79%6.46%-0.45%23.06%-25.50%23.66%35.05%17.46%
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
-9.15%15.66%33.64%48.05%-39.60%37.52%41.71%15.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than QQH's -9.15% return.


SNSR

1D
0.92%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
1.79%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*

QQH

1D
0.65%
1M
-6.36%
YTD
-9.15%
6M
-8.25%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SNSR vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SNSR vs. QQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR
SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQH
QQH Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNSRQQHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.88

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.93

1.29

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.16

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.26

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.85

3.73

-0.88

SNSR vs. QQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the QQH Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and QQH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNSRQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.88

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.50

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.70

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and QQH is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SNSR vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than QQH's 0.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
0.53%0.54%0.73%0.74%0.82%0.43%0.21%1.12%1.25%1.11%0.31%
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.23%0.21%0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum QQH drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and QQH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSRQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-41.87%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-16.18%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-41.87%

+3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-14.34%

+6.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-13.14%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

5.49%

-0.29%

Volatility

SNSR vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) at 6.41%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SNSRQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

6.41%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.15%

16.70%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.15%

22.37%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

21.65%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

24.86%

-0.32%