SNSR vs. IDRV
SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and IDRV (iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index while IDRV tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.51%/yr vs -0.25%/yr for IDRV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IDRV.
Performance
SNSR vs. IDRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than IDRV's 17.17% return.
SNSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- YTD
- 44.93%
- 6M
- 43.21%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
IDRV
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- 49.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR vs. IDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 44.93% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 21.73% |
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 17.17% | 32.24% | -16.05% | 7.83% | -36.37% | 26.99% | 59.46% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and IDRV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SNSR and IDRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SNSR vs. IDRV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNSR
IDRV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SNSR
IDRV
Industrials
SNSR
IDRV
Healthcare
SNSR
IDRV
-
Communication Services
SNSR
IDRV
-
Basic Materials
SNSR
IDRV
Utilities
SNSR
IDRV
-
Consumer Cyclical
SNSR
-
IDRV
Consumer Defensive
SNSR
-
IDRV
-
Energy
SNSR
-
IDRV
-
Financial Services
SNSR
-
IDRV
-
Real Estate
SNSR
-
IDRV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNSR vs. IDRV — Risk / Return Rank
SNSR
IDRV
SNSR vs. IDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNSR | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 3.97 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 13.15 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNSR | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.02 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.01 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.35 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. IDRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum IDRV drawdown of -53.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and IDRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNSR | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -53.00% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -12.62% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -44.00% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -53.00% | +14.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -13.79% | +13.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -22.38% | +12.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 3.80% | +0.80% |
Volatility
SNSR vs. IDRV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF (IDRV) have volatilities of 9.35% and 9.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNSR | IDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 9.41% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 18.86% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 24.81% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 27.70% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 28.09% | -3.42% |
SNSR vs. IDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IDRV's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNSR vs. IDRV - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than IDRV's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDRV iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF | 1.45% | 1.70% | 2.68% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 1.12% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNSR and IDRV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDRV has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to SNSR (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs IDRV's -53.00%.
On 5-year performance, SNSR leads with 9.51% vs -0.25% for IDRV. On fees, IDRV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SNSR has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDRV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.
IDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.37% for SNSR.
SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while IDRV tracks NYSE FactSet Global Autonomous Driving and Electric Vehicle Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.48% for IDRV.
SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNSR and IDRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer