PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQH vs. USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQH vs. USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 116.46% return.


QQH

1D
0.62%
1M
14.44%
YTD
15.43%
6M
13.16%
1Y
42.37%
3Y*
26.29%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*

USD

1D
4.76%
1M
45.27%
YTD
116.46%
6M
113.25%
1Y
300.04%
3Y*
128.54%
5Y*
71.52%
10Y*
62.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQH vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
15.43%15.66%33.64%48.05%-39.60%37.52%41.71%15.13%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
116.46%62.08%139.64%228.79%-68.57%104.27%68.16%38.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and USD is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.80

The correlation between QQH and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQH vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQH
USD

Technology

56.6%
27.4%

Communication Services

14.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Industrials

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
27.8%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

QQH
56.6%
USD
27.4%

Communication Services

QQH
14.9%
USD

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQH
13.6%
USD

-

Consumer Defensive

QQH
6.3%
USD

-

Healthcare

QQH
3.5%
USD

-

Industrials

QQH
2.2%
USD

-

Utilities

QQH
1.2%
USD

-

Basic Materials

QQH
1.0%
USD

-

Energy

QQH
0.5%
USD
0.0%

Financial Services

QQH
0.2%
USD
27.8%

Real Estate

QQH
0.0%
USD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQH vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH
QQH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

USD
USD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
USD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHUSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

4.94

-2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.98

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.54

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

9.93

-7.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.37

28.78

-21.40

QQH vs. USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the USD Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHUSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

4.94

-2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.94

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.49

+0.37

Drawdowns

QQH vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHUSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-88.63%

+46.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-31.80%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-64.46%

+39.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-77.85%

+35.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.94%

-32.36%

+19.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

10.97%

-5.04%

Volatility

QQH vs. USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 5.99%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 20.29%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHUSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

20.29%

-14.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

46.37%

-31.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

61.29%

-40.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

76.56%

-55.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

69.24%

-44.51%

QQH vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than USD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQH vs. USD - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than USD's 0.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
0.21%0.39%0.10%0.05%0.30%0.00%0.14%0.72%0.93%0.32%0.46%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQH and USD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USD has higher volatility (20.29%) compared to QQH (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs USD's -88.63%.

On 5-year performance, USD leads with 71.52% vs 15.75% for QQH. On fees, USD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USD has performed better with a 71.52% return vs 15.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

USD has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.18% for QQH.

QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while USD is Leveraged Equities. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.95% for USD.

USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQH and USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer