PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QQH vs. NVDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQH vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.68%
33.35%
QQH
NVDA

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 30.13% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 186.70% return.


QQH

YTD

30.13%

1M

4.28%

6M

13.68%

1Y

36.70%

5Y (annualized)

19.38%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

NVDA

YTD

186.70%

1M

1.71%

6M

33.35%

1Y

191.47%

5Y (annualized)

93.60%

10Y (annualized)

76.34%

Key characteristics


QQHNVDA
Sharpe Ratio1.783.68
Sortino Ratio2.343.78
Omega Ratio1.321.48
Calmar Ratio1.927.08
Martin Ratio7.2222.64
Ulcer Index5.09%8.46%
Daily Std Dev20.65%52.06%
Max Drawdown-41.87%-89.73%
Current Drawdown-2.46%-4.65%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between QQH and NVDA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQH vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQH, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.783.68
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQH, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.343.78
The chart of Omega ratio for QQH, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.48
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQH, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.927.08
The chart of Martin ratio for QQH, currently valued at 7.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.007.2222.64
QQH
NVDA

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.78
3.68
QQH
NVDA

Dividends

QQH vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.21%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%1.70%1.94%

Drawdowns

QQH vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.46%
-4.65%
QQH
NVDA

Volatility

QQH vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 7.53%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.53%
11.04%
QQH
NVDA