PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSR vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNSR vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 28.72% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 16.76% return.


SNSR

1D
-2.49%
1M
-5.77%
6M
25.56%
YTD
28.72%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*

XT

1D
-1.61%
1M
0.51%
6M
12.33%
YTD
16.76%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
28.72%6.46%-0.45%23.06%-25.50%23.66%35.05%47.90%-17.66%28.59%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
16.76%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and XT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.87

The correlation between SNSR and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNSR
XT

Technology

77.2%
43.5%

Industrials

12.3%
7.8%

Healthcare

5.3%
26.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.6%

Communication Services

0.9%
4.1%

Utilities

0.1%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

SNSR
77.2%
XT
43.5%

Industrials

SNSR
12.3%
XT
7.8%

Healthcare

SNSR
5.3%
XT
26.9%

Basic Materials

SNSR
1.6%
XT
1.6%

Communication Services

SNSR
0.9%
XT
4.1%

Utilities

SNSR
0.1%
XT
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SNSR

-

XT
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SNSR

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

SNSR

-

XT
0.5%

Financial Services

SNSR

-

XT
3.0%

Real Estate

SNSR

-

XT
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNSR vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR
SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNSRXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

3.25

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

12.61

-7.83

SNSR vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSRXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-34.41%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-10.45%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.32%

-22.09%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-34.41%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.58%

-3.32%

-8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-7.36%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

2.69%

+2.60%

Volatility

SNSR vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 6.67%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNSRXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

6.67%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

14.11%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

17.50%

+9.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.86%

21.05%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.93%

20.09%

+4.84%

SNSR vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNSR vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than XT's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
0.48%0.54%0.73%0.74%0.82%0.43%0.21%1.12%1.25%1.11%0.31%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
7.02%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNSR and XT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNSR has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to XT (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 7.17% vs 6.32% for SNSR. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.48% for SNSR.

SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNSR and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer