PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QQH vs. IETC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and IETC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

QQH vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
11.29%
15.43%
QQH
IETC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQH:

1.69

IETC:

2.02

Sortino Ratio

QQH:

2.21

IETC:

2.64

Omega Ratio

QQH:

1.30

IETC:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

QQH:

2.22

IETC:

3.46

Martin Ratio

QQH:

7.15

IETC:

13.06

Ulcer Index

QQH:

5.13%

IETC:

3.05%

Daily Std Dev

QQH:

21.70%

IETC:

19.67%

Max Drawdown

QQH:

-41.87%

IETC:

-38.48%

Current Drawdown

QQH:

-3.82%

IETC:

-2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 37.86% return, which is significantly lower than IETC's 40.44% return.


QQH

YTD

37.86%

1M

5.79%

6M

12.65%

1Y

36.99%

5Y*

19.05%

10Y*

N/A

IETC

YTD

40.44%

1M

6.49%

6M

16.24%

1Y

39.70%

5Y*

22.47%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQH vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.


QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for QQH: current value at 1.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.14%
Expense ratio chart for IETC: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQH vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQH, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.692.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQH, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.212.64
The chart of Omega ratio for QQH, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.301.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQH, currently valued at 2.22, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.223.46
The chart of Martin ratio for QQH, currently valued at 7.15, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.1513.06
QQH
IETC

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and IETC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.69
2.02
QQH
IETC

Dividends

QQH vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than IETC's 0.51% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
0.51%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.79%1.27%

Drawdowns

QQH vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and IETC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-3.82%
-2.35%
QQH
IETC

Volatility

QQH vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) at 6.93%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.00%
6.93%
QQH
IETC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab