SNSR vs. METV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index while METV tracks the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNSR returned 18.10%/yr vs 23.94%/yr for METV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for METV.

Performance

SNSR vs. METV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than METV's 1.54% return.

SNSR

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 19.62%
• YTD: 44.93%
• 6M: 43.21%
• 1Y: 49.79%
• 3Y*: 18.10%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

METV

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: -2.08%
• 1Y: 20.08%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. METV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	44.93%	6.46%	-0.45%	23.06%	-25.50%	9.93%
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	1.54%	30.83%	24.93%	60.57%	-52.66%	0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and METV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.79

The correlation between SNSR and METV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. METV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNSR	METV
Technology	78.7%	50.4%
Industrials	15.7%	-
Healthcare	4.8%	-
Communication Services	0.8%	38.1%
Basic Materials	0.2%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SNSR vs. METV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 21
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 23
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. METV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SNSR	METV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	0.84	+1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	1.26	+1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.16	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	0.71	+2.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	1.64	+9.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SNSR vs. METV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the METV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and METV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SNSR	METV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	0.84	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.16	+0.43

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. METV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum METV drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and METV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNSR	METV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.46%	-59.64%	+21.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.30%	-28.27%	+13.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.32%	-28.27%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-10.18%	+9.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.50%	-26.00%	+16.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.60%	12.29%	-7.69%

Volatility

SNSR vs. METV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) at 5.70%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNSR	METV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	5.70%	+3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.55%	17.67%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	23.88%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.16%	29.96%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.67%	29.96%	-5.29%

SNSR vs. METV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than METV's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNSR vs. METV - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than METV's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.37%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNSR and METV in my portfolio?

SNSR and METV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNSR or METV?

SNSR has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to METV (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs METV's -59.64%.

Which ETF is better, SNSR or METV?

On 3-year performance, METV leads with 23.94% vs 18.10% for SNSR. On fees, SNSR is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNSR or METV?

Over the 3-year period, METV has performed better with a 23.94% return vs 18.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNSR or METV?

SNSR is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for METV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNSR or METV?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

What is the main difference between SNSR and METV?

SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while METV tracks Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.75% for METV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.