SNSR vs. ESPO
SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNSR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.98%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for ESPO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
SNSR vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 45.58% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -11.36% return.
SNSR
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- 20.10%
- YTD
- 45.58%
- 6M
- 46.86%
- 1Y
- 53.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -11.36%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- -9.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 45.58% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 47.90% | -11.84% |
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -11.36% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and ESPO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SNSR and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SNSR vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNSR
ESPO
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SNSR
ESPO
Industrials
SNSR
ESPO
-
Healthcare
SNSR
ESPO
-
Communication Services
SNSR
ESPO
Basic Materials
SNSR
ESPO
-
Utilities
SNSR
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
SNSR
-
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
SNSR
-
ESPO
-
Energy
SNSR
-
ESPO
-
Financial Services
SNSR
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
SNSR
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNSR vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
SNSR
ESPO
SNSR vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNSR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | -0.53 | +2.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | -0.63 | +3.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.93 | +0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | -0.29 | +4.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | -0.54 | +12.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNSR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | -0.53 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNSR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -50.99% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -27.81% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -27.81% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -48.33% | +10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -23.98% | +23.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -15.02% | +5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 15.22% | -10.62% |
Volatility
SNSR vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.54%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNSR | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.30% | 4.54% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.57% | 14.43% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 18.83% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 25.11% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 25.75% | -1.07% |
SNSR vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNSR vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ESPO's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.40% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNSR and ESPO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNSR has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to ESPO (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, SNSR leads with 9.98% vs 7.15% for ESPO. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SNSR has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.
ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.37% for SNSR.
SNSR is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.55% for ESPO.
SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNSR and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer