QQH vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQH returned 12.07%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

QQH vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.48% return.

QQH

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 6.74%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 28.70%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 12.07%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQH vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	6.74%	15.66%	33.64%	48.05%	-39.60%	37.52%	9.25%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and QQQM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.94

The correlation between QQH and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQH vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 35
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 34

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQH	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.97	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.58	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	2.94	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.73	10.88	-6.15

QQH vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQH vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQH	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.87%	-35.04%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.18%	-11.96%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.84%	-22.70%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.87%	-35.04%	-6.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.53%	-4.24%	-3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-8.20%	-4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.08%	3.22%	+2.86%

Volatility

QQH vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) has a higher volatility of 11.82% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 9.00%. This indicates that QQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQH	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.82%	9.00%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.82%	14.43%	+3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.13%	17.85%	+5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	22.53%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	22.30%	+2.70%

QQH vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQH vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.20%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQH and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, QQH and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQH or QQQM?

QQH has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to QQQM (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, QQH or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.11% vs 12.07% for QQH. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQH or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQH or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQH or QQQM?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.20% for QQH.

What is the main difference between QQH and QQQM?

QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.