PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQH vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQH vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQH vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
-9.15%15.66%33.64%48.05%-39.60%37.52%9.22%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-4.75%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a -9.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's -4.75% return.


QQH

1D
0.65%
1M
-6.36%
YTD
-9.15%
6M
-8.25%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.78%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQH vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQH vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH
QQH Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.09

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.68

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.02

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.73

7.35

-3.62

QQH vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.09

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.64

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and QQQM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQH vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.23%0.21%0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQH vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-35.04%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-12.55%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-35.04%

-6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.34%

-7.86%

-6.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.14%

-8.47%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

3.44%

+2.05%

Volatility

QQH vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQHQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.58%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

12.79%

+3.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.37%

22.45%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

22.24%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

22.26%

+2.60%